Title: Psychological impact of being wrongfully accused of criminal offenses: A systematic literature review

Publication: Medicine, Science and the Law

Authors: Samantha K Brooks, Neil Greenberg

Link: https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802420949069 

Summary: The systematic literature review on wrongful accusations revealed that they have significant psychological and psychosocial impacts. Wrongfully accused individuals experience a loss of identity, stigma, and strain in relationships. They also suffer from psychological and physical health issues, financial difficulties, and negative attitudes towards the justice system. Traumatic experiences in custody and challenges in readjustment were also observed. The findings emphasize the need to improve public perception of wrongful convictions and provide dedicated mental health support for those who are wrongfully accused.

Family Reunion Comment: This further proves that the court needs to check facts to ensure accusations are not false as false accusations will affect the accused and the child as well as their relationship. 

Title: Risks and Realities of Working with Alienated Children

Publication: Family Court Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal 

Authors: Richard A. Warshak

Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12481 

Summary: Involvement in custody cases involving accusations of parental alienation carries professional and personal risks. These risks include false identifications of parental alienation, leading to complaints and public condemnation. Working in an emerging field and dealing with children who resist repairing relationships can also result in unfounded accusations, media attacks, harassment, and threats. Colleague shunning and regulatory agency complaints are additional challenges. This article examines the factors contributing to these risks, offers precautions to mitigate false accusations, and provides recommendations for handling regulatory agencies. Criticisms should be carefully evaluated in light of case evidence and empirical data. While some interventions for alienated children have valid concerns, anecdotal complaints do not reflect the majority’s experiences.

Family Reunion Comment: Involvement in custody cases with parental alienation accusations teaches us important lessons: Professionals face risks of false accusations and should prioritize evidence-based approaches. Protecting children’s well-being is crucial, and precautions are necessary to mitigate risks. A balanced and informed approach, continuous learning, and staying updated with best practices are essential.

Title: False Allegations of Domestic Violence: A Qualitative Analysis of Ex-Partners’ Narratives

Publication: Journal of Family Violence

Authors: Hila Avieli

Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00342-w 

Summary: This study explored the experiences of individuals falsely accused of domestic violence in custody disputes and divorce cases. Interviews with 19 victims revealed three main themes: false allegations as ongoing intimate partner violence, the traumatic impact of false allegations, and the losses suffered as a result. The findings highlight the qualitative aspects of false allegations and their connection to coercive control in conflicted relationships. It is important for professionals to recognize false allegations as abusive tactics that cause significant pain to those involved.

Family Reunion Comment: This study reveals the serious issue of false allegations of violence and abuse in custody disputes and divorce cases. It teaches us that falsely accused individuals endure long-lasting impacts resembling ongoing intimate partner violence. They may be connected to coercive control in conflicted relationships.

Title: Malicious Reports of Child Maltreatment as Coercive Control: Mothers and Domestic and Family Violence

Publication: Journal of Family Violence

Authors: Heather Douglas & Emma Fell 

Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00128-1  

Summary: This article explores how abusive partners or ex-partners use false reports of child maltreatment to control their victims in the context of domestic and family violence. Interviews with 65 women who experienced such abuse were conducted, with a focus on 11 victims who were maliciously reported or threatened to be reported to child protective services. The victims faced significant negative consequences. The article suggests that better investigation processes, including considering both parties involved and identifying the perpetrator of domestic violence, can support victims and discourage this form of abuse.

Family Reunion Comment: This study teaches us that false reports of child maltreatment are used as a controlling tactic in domestic and family violence. These reports have serious impacts on victims. Improved investigations that consider both parties and identify the true perpetrator are necessary to support victims and discourage this behavior. Recognizing and addressing this tactic is crucial for supporting victims of domestic and family violence. 

Title: Child Custody Outcomes in Cases Involving Parental Alienation and Abuse Allegations

Publication: GW Law

Authors: Joan S. Meier, Sean Dickson, Chris O’Sullivan, Leora Rosen, & Jeffrey Hayes

Link: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3448062 

Summary: This study exposes troubling biases in custody courts regarding allegations of intimate partner violence. Mothers’ claims of abuse, particularly child abuse, are met with skepticism. The theory of parental alienation undermines these claims, favoring accused fathers. Gender differences are evident when fathers accuse mothers of abuse. Involvement of Guardians Ad Litem or custody evaluators intensifies skepticism towards mothers’ claims and increases the likelihood of custody removal. This research sheds light on the gender dynamics and outcomes in custody cases involving alienation, abuse, and disputes.

Family Reunion Comment: This study uncovers bias in custody courts regarding allegations of partner violence. Mothers reporting abuse face skepticism, while parental alienation theory favors accused fathers. Gender differences exist in accusations, and involvement of evaluators intensifies skepticism and custody loss risk. Addressing biases is vital for fair custody proceedings